Soul Science - Future Predictions

Despite the fears and doubts that plague each and every one of us on a daily - if not moment by moment - basis, our immortal future likely exists as a fait accompli and all will turn out exactly as it should. Exactly as conceived, carried out and concluded, all according to 'plan', yet not in the way we think of something that is predesigned or 'fated' to be, but in a way that allows for a freedom of will and wiggle room within the original design. In other words, life is a foregone conclusion in all things.



As broad and sweeping as the above generalization appears, I'll tighten up my line of reasoning in a moment, but before I do - since this isn't really about a process in the linear fashion in which we tend to think - I've got to ramble all over the place making the points of association that have got me to thinking in this particular way, about a particular 'science of soul' that I have very good reason to suspect exists, whether or not we are aware of it. (I am very inclined to analyze, to shuffle through the disparate and to gather in those bits of common denominators, to try to latch onto any outstanding threads I can uncover that will help wind my way through this mysterious and marvelous tapestry we call Life - such is my proclivity. Maybe I just have too much free time on my hands lol)



Anyway, you understand that I have been thinking and conjecturing. And what I propose is that there is indeed, a very real and concrete 'science' (for lack of a better term) of the soul, of our immortal selves and the continuance and betterment thereof, that firmly exists because we are in the process of creating it, in the here and now. Like a mobius strip, like the spiralling of our DNA, what is being done has already been done and, as such, has always existed. We are talking patterns here, versus linear progression of events.



Stay with me on this, though it gets worse before it, hopefully, gets better. Now, take the personal experiences of famed out of body (OBE) researcher and explorer Robert Monroe*. If any credence is to be attributed his decades of painstaking methodology, then we must certainly allow a pause or two to fully consider what was implied by his meetings with his I-There, his many, many parts of One, his unification of these parts, and his completion of patterns of his soul's (I-There, future self, One, etc - take your pick of label) experience. For not only did Robert Monroe allegedly repeat and fulfill events as already (as we consider time to be) experienced by his future self, but then he, too, once having experienced a pattern of events, became the future self who in turn helped a 'younger' self to again complete a pattern. As if, in some mobius manner, from the oversoul on high down through to the youngest and smallest version of the Entire Entity, each and every facet of this Total Being Entire Entity (the One) had to run the obstacle course for itself, to complete an event pattern, before it could be bumped up into a union/melding/awareness which put this facet onto the next 'rung' of its own ladder. In other, more simpler terms - Robert Monroe's experiences were very akin to the New Age theory that 'it is not so much a matter of discovering what one does not know, but instead a matter of remembering what is already known'.



Time, according to this conception, does not exclusively run forward in the way we think it, but instead is a side effect of events experienced, remembered and re-experienced, until a complete pattern of individual soul awareness is established throughout all parts of the self-aware energy.

Admittedly, this concept takes some work to wrap the mind around, so conditioned are we to the 'forward arrow' of time. (Interestingly enough, as a tidbit here - Robert Monroe, when he was guessing the identity of his mysterious helper/The One - queried if this entity was an ET/alien, and his One responded 'No, that is a different pattern!')

So, the pattern I believe is before us, that we are collectively experiencing under the illusion of forward time, is that of setting our immortality or science of soul into place. It's simply a foregone conclusion, should man not 'self-destruct' and survive long enough to finish his tasks, then we are at every moment, in every way, engaged in the process of learning and securing what will turn out to be an immortal state. Each step that progresses our knowledge of medicine, technology, eco-awareness, ethics, morals, God, soul, self, psychology, ease of living, cosmic exploration, sub-atomic particles, gravity, light, frequencies - the whole d**n kit and kaboodle, are no more than fundamental steps as part the immortality pattern (which, of course, is where we must 'first' go).


Eventually, we will prolong life further and further, better understand disease, create cures for the same, expand upon our knowledge of light and energy, how the physical body functions et al. We will learn to cure distinguish the energetic body and discover how to work upon it, we will tweak, experiment and duplicate the entire process. Currently, one area of scientific interest is the transference of consciousness. And the things we can now do - things such as the mind successfully interfacing with computers, wheelchairs, and that ilk - are all STEPS along a way, steps that will inexorably lead us, eventually, to the culmination of immortality. There is no other direction to go. We are driven, by the very need to survive, to accomplish these things and thus we will.

Yet, once having achieved this milestone (and do not think it will be a static thing - we will continue to tweak and explore the very nature of immortality and consciousness itself, for this is how man is designed) - we have completed a crucial 'pattern'. More importantly, once time and entropy and consciousness has been surmounted, it is thus achieved throughout the entire now of man's experience. Remember, time is an illusion, a misinterpretation of consciousness negotiating 3-dimensional 'space'.

Regardless if it takes man another 1,500 years to accomplish his own immortality, once it has been accomplished, it is 'accomplished' for all time. That includes you and I sitting here in our perceived now. This is how you are able to meet the light, how you are able to connect with a higher self, discourse with the spirit, talk with your dead, reincarnate, divide your consciousness and so forth. Since the light is already here, and since man must eventually succeed in his quest for immortality, it has already been done. Linear time will not be the absolute we think it is, nor is it in the 'now'.

We are simply experiencing one of many, countless patterns of being.



Another way to think of it is this: As you sit now reading this, imagine your 10 year old self walking into the room to sit beside you. While, in our terms, you and he are the same individual separated by 'time', what really separates you are events. Therefore, you and the 10 year old, while sharing the same energetic 'root', are distinct and different 'branches' on the entire tree of One. You do not, as yet, share the same events.

What you do indeed share, is the same pattern of experience.

* Again, I simply cannot recommend Robert Monroe's books highly enough! Journeys Out of Body, Far Journeys, Ultimate Journey are must reads.

So is the Seth material by Jane Roberts, though much of Seth's writings
require a strict focus of concentration to fully grasp his meaning. Definitely not for the average novice, but for those whose minds have already been conditioned to think outside the 'box'.

Dreams and the Mind After Death

IS REALITY A FOCUS OF CONSCIOUSNESS?



Today my thinking cap has been firmly planted on the borderland between the world of dreams and the world of Reality with a capital R. This is due in part to a rather unusual dream I had in the wee hours of morning, one that I was abruptly awakened out of - hence my recall may have been sharper than what normally entails.



Admittedly, we are all in agreement as to what constitutes waking, hands-on reality. There is an unspoken, general consensus of long standing (a gentleman's agreement, if you will) that any experience not of the objective or externally generated is not really 'Real'. Our philosophers and psychologists allow for a little wiggle room when they use terms such as 'subjectively real' or 'internally generated', to label dreams, delusions, hallucinations or any other state of mind which cannot be validated by events in The Real World.



And you can't blame them; the very nature of our dichotomous brain system does not allow for a 'grey' state - things are either black or white, here nor there, real or imaginary. But I think we need to do a wee bit more wiggling, and take a long, healthy stretch into some of this uncharted territory. Such as dreams in general, and my dream in particular.



In the interest of brevity, the apex of MY morning dream was that of finding myself (with the typical and accepted invisible other or doppelganger present to my left - most of you know what I mean by this)... anyway, finding myself and he/she poised in front of a low, rocky area, through the middle of which ran a frothing, active tributary of water which grew narrower and narrower the further away from us it rushed. It was as if we stood at the mouth of a rocky, watery aperture. There was a wind, so brilliantly alive that we were engulfed in mist and rivulets of damp. Strewn here and there were beautiful homes set amongst the low cliffs, the most attractive of which lay at the furthest end from us, where the water and rock narrowed to a point from which these energies were being emitted.



Everything was so naturally colored, so alive and life-like, complete with detailed sensations of both wind and water buffeting my 'body' - (and mind you, this was not a hyper-reality, where the senses are super heightened, this appeared no different to the senses than waking life). But when I saw this beautiful home situated there at the entrance point, I actually began to cry in my dream. I could feel the gentle tears gather at my eyes to drip down on one check and that is the God's Honest Truth. [while I have had dreams wherein I've ranted, panicked, screamed, yelled, and so forth, I have never had a life-like experience of actual, 'normal' tears. I think this is the first time I've cried in a dream and felt the wet. And no, there were no tears or moisture present on my face when I awoke.]

Now, if one can dream and not know the difference -either upon the moment or later reflection - between Reality or Other, then who is to say what is really Real with a capital R? If for just one moment we shelve the bias of general consensus that demands all Reality must be objective in origin, what else is left us to declare one state more valid than another? If the mind/soul cannot tell the difference, then, to all intent and purpose, is there actually a difference?

Maybe the difference is only a matter of preference or of focus?

There have been many learned individuals who hold that Reality with a capital R, is no more or less than a dominance of whichever brain hemisphere is doing the driving. Seth, aka Jane Roberts, noted more than once that after death the hemispheres switched places (and here we have the mirror effect at work - AGAIN!). According to Seth, after we are 'dead', it is our right brain hemisphere that becomes the dominant partner, while the left (logic, reason, reading and writing) hemisphere become the submissive, silent partner. This makes no small sense when we consider that dreams, ghosts, aliens, and anything else from the land of subjective carries with it a proclivity for metaphor and symbolism (as does the right brain hemisphere).

So, taking this idea a step further, if we deny the 'reality' validity of the dream world, of the subjective state, aren't we also denying half of Reality with a capital R, itself? To do so would be akin to denying all that is experienced as cold (ice, snow, and so forth) and to state with bias that only that which is warm is Reality.


We may have to re-shift our conceptions of what is real and what is not, and perhaps the sooner the better. By the very nature of our prejudice, we may actually be in denial of half of our cosmic existence - no matter how well intended we may be in so doing.


I have to consider if there really is no line of demarcation between in and out, between life and 'death', between subjective and objective. I suspect these may be merely the rather poor divisions set in place by an already divided brain system.

A final thought. If there is no borderland, no actual demarcation or point A vs Point B, then the adage is true that the dead are here with us. Or as the aliens have remarked, "you are always here (with us)". There is only ONE arena, one true reality that encompasses both the subjective and objective. There is only ONE world and it is our less-than-perfect minds that only THINK there is a distinction (and relay this erroneous perception back at us).


Dreams are fascinating, whether one's own or that of others. And if Seth was correct, then we are going to have one mess on our hands when our time comes to die, and we must suddenly confront the other half of the coin that never was a half at all. Can you imagine learning to gauge and react and manipulate within a world that is right brained dominate? Where metaphor and symbolism are the norm, and language/detail are not? What a misadventure that will be! And it lays in wait for all of us.


Is there a way out? Yes...